Difference between revisions of "Talk:Patches"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→One page for each patch note, or not?: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
4 pages for the very earlier patches were created, but none since. Would it be useful to basically just copy/paste patch notes on the wiki, or are links to the patch notes enough? | 4 pages for the very earlier patches were created, but none since. Would it be useful to basically just copy/paste patch notes on the wiki, or are links to the patch notes enough? | ||
I feel like it would require some internal linking, categorizing, referencing, or other editorial work to make them useful beyond just copying them, and that the current state of the wiki doesn't support making such effort (other priorities). | |||
I feel like it would require some internal linking, categorizing, referencing, or other editorial work to make them useful beyond just copying them, and that the current state of the wiki doesn't support making such effort (other priorities). What do you think? | |||
--[[User:Evolena|Evolena]] ([[User talk:Evolena|talk]]) 16:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC) | --[[User:Evolena|Evolena]] ([[User talk:Evolena|talk]]) 16:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:13, 1 July 2022
One page for each patch note, or not?[edit]
4 pages for the very earlier patches were created, but none since. Would it be useful to basically just copy/paste patch notes on the wiki, or are links to the patch notes enough?
I feel like it would require some internal linking, categorizing, referencing, or other editorial work to make them useful beyond just copying them, and that the current state of the wiki doesn't support making such effort (other priorities). What do you think?